Category Archives: Biblical Worldview

A Proper Christian Theodicy

Dearest hijas,

One of the most pernicious arguments against the existence of God is based on the existence of physical and moral evil in the world. The question many unbelievers voice is, “If God is real, perfectly good and omnipotent, how can evil exist?” The “problem of evil” can be characterized in the following syllogism:

Premise 1: If God were all powerful, He would be able to prevent evil.
Premise 2: If God were all good, He would desire to prevent evil.
Conclusion: If God were both all-powerful and all-good, there would be no evil.
Premise 3: But there is evil.
Conclusion: Therefore, no all-powerful, all-good God exists.

The Christian response to the problem of evil is called theodicy, from the Greek theos and dike and combined mean “judicial hearing of God”, or the “justification of God”. Theodicy involves a vindication of God’s justice against the charge that the presence of evil in creation shows him to be unjust, capricious, cruel, haphazard, nonexistent, or even diabolical.

Theodicy declares that God is all-powerful and all-good, even though this might not seem to be the case since both physical (natural) and moral evil (sin) exists in His creation. The only proper Christian theodicy then, must come from Scripture.

Consider the following questions:
1. What did the first Adam do that the last Adam had to undo?

2: The promised Seed of Gen. 3:15 came to fix what as the last Adam?

3: What did Christ have to rectify, fix, stop?

Now consider the following:
1. If I define incorrectly the results/consequences of the first Adam, then I am redefining incorrectly the effects of the last Adam.

2. If natural evil (death, parasites, diseases, tumors, cancers, carnivory (including “the chase”), animals red in tooth and claw, bloodshed, mass extinctions, meteorite impacts, tsunamis, hurricanes, tornadoes, volcanic eruptions, massive earthquakes) existed before Adam, then Christ’s work on the cross doesn’t alter it, and it’s not part of the judgment of Genesis 3.

3. Millions and billions of years of death, disease, blood, gore, killing, natural disasters, etc., then become the work of Christ in creation (John 1:3, Col. 1:16), the outflow of His very being.

4. Millions and billions of years (a random, wasteful, inefficient, trial and error charade) makes Christ guilty of a creative process that involved death, disease, blood, gore, killing, natural disasters, etc., in the animal kingdom and throughout the earth in the process of arriving at man millions of years later.

5. It therefore impugns Christ with divine confusion and cruelty, and opposes the very character of God: His Holiness, His Love, His justice and fairness, His wisdom, His goodness, etc.

6. When Christ comes to His work on the cross then in the New Testament, He would be dying for his own work, pierced through for His own transgressions, bruised for His own iniquities, chastened for His own well-being (compare to Isaiah 53), not as judgment for the consequences of the first Adam’s sin.

A proper Christian theodicy begins in Genesis with a proper theology of the first Adam as the reason and requirement for a proper theology of the last Adam.

With love always,
Dear ol’ Dad,
Vaya con Dios mis hijas

Advertisements

“Dirty” Environment Enriches a Baby’s Microbiome. Dogs as Protectors?

Dearest hijas,

Thought you might enjoy this article on one of our favorite subjects: dogs. From Frannie to Snickers, Pepper to Bubbas, and now Dundee the boxer, we’ve loved our dogs haven’t we? Seems that a lick in the face by one of our favorite pooches can be beneficial, especially for babies.

http://www.icr.org/article/9974

With love,

Dear ol’ Dad

Vaya con Dios, mis hijas

Do You Have a Biblical Worldview?

Dearest hijas,

What is a Biblical worldview, and do you have one? A recent study by The American Culture and Faith Institute (ACFI) was seeking to determine how many Americans use the Bible as their filter for reality, to determine right from wrong, and to shape their beliefs, attitudes, and actions.

Shockingly, only 4% of millennials qualified to have a Biblical worldview. These are the next generation of pastors, teachers, elders, deacons, Sunday school teachers, and parents!

Here’s the link to the article:

https://answersingenesis.org/culture/study-shows-only-10-percent-americans-have-biblical-worldview/

Make sure your worldview is Biblical, mis hijas. It starts with a proper understanding that God is Creator, that you and I are creatures (the thing created). The world is not an emanation from God’s essence, one piece of God, if you like, but that the created world is entirely and irrevocably distinct from God. As creatures of God, we are capable of fellowship with God however.

It entails the absolute tripersonality of God. God is absolute personality, and because He is absolute, He is self-sufficient and self-existent, and therefore does not depend on anything else. He knows, He loves, He speaks. He is not just personal, but tripersonal, one God in three persons, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. This has important philosophical implications and answers the age-old philosophical problem of the one and the many (universals and particulars). God is both one and many, and has made a universe that is both one and many.

As to the relationship between Creator and creature, the Bible’s description of this relationship is lordship. God is LORD, and creation is His servant. God’s Lordship entails His control, authority, and presence. God controls all things according to His will. His authority is His right to be obeyed. His presence is His nearness to His creation and His intimate relationships with it.

We also know that a Biblical worldview describes man’s condition. Everyone of us, dead and lost in sin, in rebellion against our Creator. Everyone of us in need of an answer to our sin problem; an answer that can only be found in an acceptance of Christ’s death on the cross in our behalf, as a substitute for the death we rightly deserve.

With love,
Dad
Vaya con Dios mis hijas

Offering Unacceptable Sacrifice

Dear hijas,
Have you ever wondered why Cain’s sacrifice of the fruit of the ground in Genesis 4 was unacceptable to God, and Abel’s sacrifice of the firstlings of his flock and their fat portions was? “I mean, wow, God, since Cain was a tiller of the ground (Gen. 4.2), why did you reject his hard work at producing a good crop from the ground and only accept Abel’s”? “That seems totally unfair, Cain wasn’t a keeper of flocks like his brother Abel, but shouldn’t his hard work of watering and tending and careful grooming of the fruit of the ground be enough”? “Why was this not acceptable’?

Well, the answer lies in what happened in Genesis 3 and the Fall of Adam and Eve. What do we see God do after he confronted Adam and Eve with their sin in Genesis 3? Genesis 3:21 tells us that “the Lord God made garments of skin for Adam and his wife, and clothed them”.

adam_and_eve

And how did God get those animal skins? “Poof, there it is”? No, the logical inference is that God killed the animal or animals and clothed Adam and Eve with their skins. You see, we have to remember what was going on here. Adam and Eve ate from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil which God commanded them not to eat. They felt ashamed that they were naked and clothed themselves by sewing fig leaves together. God confronted the man and woman in the Garden. He got confessions from Adam and Eve. The man blamed the woman and the woman blamed the Serpent, both of them unwilling to take responsibility for what they have done. God curses the Serpent above all ‘other’ beasts and between his seed and the woman’s seed, the woman in childbearing, and the ground that the man would have to toil and work in by the sweat of his brow to produce the plants and bread he would eat.

But God doesn’t leave them there in that sinful state, does He? He provides the way of atonement; a proper way back. That way of atonement required a sacrifice: the death of an animal. The animal’s death was a substitute for their penalty of sin. It was a stark reminder to Adam and Eve of the dire consequences of their disobedience. God Himself sets up the pattern for an acceptable sacrifice, for what is required to satisfy His holy justice. It required the shedding of blood (Heb. 9:22). You can see this pattern repeated time and time again throughout the Old Testament. The sacrifice of animals as a guilt offering (Lev. 5 & 6), the sprinkling and pouring out of the blood on the horns and base of the altar in the tent of meeting (Lev. 3 & 4), the bull, the sheep, the goats, the turtledoves and pidgeons (Lev. 1), were all required for the remission of sin. A sacrificial victim is slain, their penalty is paid, and they are covered by the blood of the substitute.

And when we come to the New Testament, Christ Himself, fulfilled this law of atonement by shedding His own blood, sacrificing Himself, and offering His own body on the Cross as the substitute.

So, how does this relate to Cain and Abel? In this mis hijas; God showed Adam and Eve the proper way to approach Him now that sin was in the world. Fig leaves as coverings weren’t enough and was not the proper way. It required a sacrifice; the death of an animal and the shedding of blood. Adam and Eve passed this knowledge on to their sons. Abel followed the proper way of an acceptable sacrifice, Cain did not. Cain knew what was acceptable to God, but chose to think his way of the fruit of the ground would be “good enough”. Notice God’s communication with Cain in Genesis 4: 4-7, especially verse 7, “If you do well, will not your countenance be lifted up”? ‘Doing well’ meant the proper and acceptable way of sacrifice; an animal sacrifice and the shedding of blood.

The lesson for Cain was that he couldn’t approach God through whatever he himself thought was worthy. There was only one proper way to do this and it wasn’t through an offering of the fruit of the ground. It required an animal sacrifice and the shedding of blood. The lesson for us living after the once for all sacrifice of Christ on the Cross is the same. Christ paid the price, He is our substitute, and we only approach God through Him.

With love,

Dear ol’ Dad

Vaya con Dios mis hijas